Social cohesion updating the state of the research curvy dating
Source: OECD (2011), Perspectives on Global Development 2012: Social Cohesion in a Shifting World, OECD Publishing, Governments which ignore questions of social cohesion risk having to face social instability and undertake ineffective policy interventions.
It is clearly not sufficient to apply technocratic policy frameworks and disregard people’s desire for an inclusive political process.
This is particularly true in the context of shifting wealth, which quickens economic growth and social dislocation and requires innovative responses.
The process of policy making is as important as the policies themselves for building social cohesion.
Greater inclusiveness of schools for all social groups can also result from the development of teaching techniques and curricula that foster diversity and enhance positive perceptions of others within the system and society.
The harnessing of civic participation and political feedback mechanisms is essential for positive and continuous growth.
There are different areas of public policies that are key to social cohesion.
Greater fiscal space opens a window of opportunity for development and stronger social cohesion in developing countries.
The aims of the present paper are to explore how traditional gender roles (focusing mainly on attitudes towards the division of labour between men and women) relate to social cohesion and to examine whether this relationship differs among men and women.
The multi-dimensional concept of social cohesion is measured by two general components: a behavioural dimension (consisting of civic and political participation and the intensity of non-kin social relations) and an attitudinal dimension (institutional trust and solidarity).